House Of ZaidA little window on my view of the world
Terran1212
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit Terran1212's Xanga Site!

State: Georgia
Birthday: 4/19/1988
Gender: Male


Interests: International Affairs/Politics, Cats, Writing, Video Games
Expertise: Politics and Writing
Occupation: Student
Industry: Other


Message: message meEmail: email me
AIM: areo64


Member Since: 4/21/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
bhodi_rn
time_for_peace
Tuma_al_Zrai
mroshii
NYkrinDC
OpinionPro
Altshiftdelete
xYour_Sins_Into_Mex
ithiliya
diverstella
TheInquisition
NationalTraditionalist
SomewhatNormal
insaneindabrain8
lemonflower
theliberalsays
leaf_in_autumn
doxiegrl1
WRCWAZZUP2

Blogrings
Magnet Kids ® Us™
previous - random - next

Green Party
previous - random - next

TALK POLITICS OR DIE!
previous - random - next

Noam Chomsky is my bitch
previous - random - next

---The Voice of the People---
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Friday, September 08, 2006

What I've Been Up To

Sorry to any readers of this that I've neglected. It's just there's been a big change in the life of Zaid -- I've gone to college (UGA). Between dodging cars being driven by crazy people and wondering how so many rednecks exist in life, I actually started to write for an Athens-based blog, A La Gauche.

 

You can read my first two entries here:

 

http://farleft.blogspot.com/2006/08/wonderful-junior-frist.html

 

http://farleft.blogspot.com/2006/08/adios-blair.html

 

That certainly doesn't mean I'm going to neglect this journal; I will definitely post more when I get the time.

In the meantime, check out some Luckovich:

Rumsfeld is terribly incompetent, but the point rarely made by the media establishment is that he is also a war criminal that could easily be put away for life.

Um, ok.

It's OK, thousands others have been kidnapped ("detained") who had nothing to do with 9-11.

My school made the Luckovich! Not for the best of things, but...

Katie Couric: making sure our media will never stand up for our democracy.

 

Always,

Zaid

 

 


Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Cynthia

 

Did anyone see her concession speech?

It was beautiful.

I know McKinney has been under fire a lot from the conservative and moderate Democrats, and especially from the Republicans -- but seeing this speech brought me back to why I vehemently supported her in the primary campaigns and really since 2004: she speaks truth boldly.

She is at the side of anyone being beaten down or destroyed, anyone been oppressed. She spoke of peace and justice in a way I've seen no Democrats do that, save for maybe Kucinich.

There was no negativity in her concession speech; she spoke of hope for an America that embraces the world, that stands by working people and the unemployed across the planet and not for "Halliburton and the Carlyle Group." She spoke up for the Lebanese, and the "hundreds of thousands of Iraqis hurt or dead" because of what we did. She thanked the friends, family, the activists from across the 4th District who helped her so much (I've never seen Hank Johnson at any antiwar rally, or seen him travel to foreign countries to assist people being hurt by our policies as McKinney has).

And lastly she said she "wishes well" to Hank Johnson. She gave an overt hope to the massive crowd around her that Johnson would follow in her footsteps -- to become the quintessential "peace and justice Democrat" she declared herself to be. With his hawkish indifference to the dying poor in Lebanon, I doubt he can do that. But maybe the 4th District can compel him to.

After meeting Congresswoman McKinney in June and seeing the Sundance award-winning film in which she is a central character, American Blackout, I can heartily say she is a hero. She is a relentless fighter truly in the vein of Martin and Malcom, and I say that without a hint of hesitation.

I don't know what she will do now. In 2002 she lost to a coalition of GOP voters (at least 30,000 Republicans crossover voted in the Primary to beat her) and pro-Israeli groups (complete with people saying she took money from "Islamic terrorist groups"). She regained her seat easily in 2004. Maybe she'll regain in 2006 after the non-incident with the police officer is forgotten. Maybe she'll go on to be a powerful activist, which she had been in her 14 years in Congress and before that in the state legislature where she made her mark by lambasting the bombing of Iraq during the first Gulf War.

Wherever she goes, she will be missed by those who knew her -- who stood with her as she denounced the war against poor people here and abroad, who attended her events and festivals. She will be missed by the poor and disenfranchised who didn't enter politics because they deemed it the realm of only the "rich white man."

I wish her well and I know that she will act positively for the world wherever she goes.

 

 

thanks to Blackcommentator.com

 

Zaid


Wednesday, July 26, 2006

A Joke

Amidst the total barbarism of what Israel continues to do in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories, as well as the lethal reprisals by Hezbollah and the further radicalization of countless Muslims (which will  lead to tomorrow's Bin Ladens -- remember he said he first decided to wage war against the West when he saw "the burning towers" of Beirut when the Israelis crushed it the first time), there are some places on this global force we call the net that have a way of dealing with such cruelty and despair: satire.

From www.whitehouse.org:




Dear Brother and Sisters in Tingly Apocalyptic Anticipation:

Well, goodness me, it looks as if Israel came up with a cagey trick that eluded even the imminently tricky, soon to be caged, Halliburton.  It seems that the quickest way to spend billions of dollars to make sure that Iraq's infrastructure is no longer the worst in the region is to bomb all the airports, roads and bridges in Lebanon.

Yes, if you heard the bombs falling, you'll know that democracy is on the march in the Middle East!  And, from the looks of things, it is apparently wearing rather clumsy boots and not sticking to any designated crosswalks.  If you ask me, it's more like democrazy!  But no matter what you call what we've sold to the world, America is clearly undergoing some acute seller's remorse now that both Iraq and Lebanon have used this whole "voting" thing to willfully elect crazy Islamic fundamentalists who hate America and Israel. 

Yes, the unwanted gift (secular democracy) from an uninvited guest (U.S. Marines) is perversely being used to bring about a surprisingly un-American result (majority rule). With mischievous ingratitude, Arabs are capitalizing on the purported mechanisms of "one person one vote" democracy to fill the seats of their local parliaments and condominium associates with more crazed, intolerant religious zealots than are ordinarily seen outside of the United States House of Representatives.

As anyone who has suffered my icy regard after watching me unwrap an ill-conceived hostess gift can attest, present giving can be a rather dicey undertaking.  As such, America really should have devoted slightly more attention to the type of democracy she was unloading on those fanatical, yelping heathens before showing up on their dusty doorstep, unannounced, with it. 

It is clear to me the cause of this disastrous mix-up.  Without thinking, as is his leitmotif, President Bush bundled up and exported Democracy 1776, a version of government made obsolete when the Supreme Court unveiled a beta version of Democracy 2000 on December 12, 2000. 

As some of you with fetishes for picturesque, historical chestnuts may recall, Democracy Version 1776 included something known by nostalgia addicts as a "Constitution," but more presciently referred to by George W. Bush as "just a goddamned piece of paper." Gotta match?

More to the point, Democracy Version 1776 was also a rather quaint type of government wherein citizens underwent the tedious, charmless task of actually tallying the votes cast.  Such laborious counting can, of course, lead to inconvenient results. This is precisely why America wisely dispensed with being subjected to the unpredictable vicissitudes of voters' actual preferences by making so many polling stations Democracy 2000 compliant after installing Diebold Vote Correcting Machines™.

You see, American Democracy Version 2000 is all about pushing placebo screens, rather than the anal, wholly superfluous preoccupation with memorializing those quixotic stabs at LCD pixels.  If we had only thought to bundle up a few container ships with Diebold Vote Correcting Machines™ and sent them to Lebanon, the same software that allowed our handsome President to win Ohio, would have ensured that Hezbollah was trounced by a number of votes roughly equivalent to 400 times the population of Beirut.  Instead, Islamic extremists are gaining power, making a trigger-happy Israel mail-order a few thousand more triggers. Oh, snap!

Whereas Truman adopted the Marshall Plan as the centerpiece of American foreign policy, our current president has adopted a more universal concept.  It is called the Law of Unintended Consequences.  To wit, President Bush made Iran powerful by destroying Afghanistan and Iraq.  And since Iran has had the temerity to fill the vacuum we created, they must be punished.  Of course, we have no troops to even keep New Orleans safe, much less make Tehran unsafe.  So America's new war with Iran has been outsourced to Israel and Hezbollah, who are respectively, if not respectfully, pushing the buttons on our bombs.  And Condoleezza Rice is left to turn shuttle diplomacy into scuttle diplomacy.  In a stroke of inspiration, Condi has appropriated her method of brokering peace from Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie by regarding America's two biggest threats (Iran and North Korea) with a snarling, "I'm not talking to her!  She knows what she did."   


And since our President is ignoring all inconvenient facts and foes, he's freed up more time for international freshman-mixer high jinx by becoming the Kevin Costner of global diplomacy, alarming German Chancellor Angela Merkel with a "no happy ending" massage at the G8 conference (left).  And perhaps to reassure dignitaries that he, unlike his father, is able to keep food in his mouth while meeting foreigners, W showed Tony Blair how he could talk with a buttered roll turning into slick paste between his teeth without any of it coating Tony's lap.  Although our President did manage to let slip out of that same mouth language that would have gotten a hefty fine from his own gloriously puritanical FCC.


The ironic part is that this is probably far superior to his actual plan.

Some in Congress saying no to barbarity

Congressman Kucinich (D-OH) -- a steadfast fighter for the oppressed and underprivileged his entire life -- has joined with a handful of Democrats (Feingold, Kerry, Clinton, and others have all said they "unequivocally" support the IDF's continued rampage in the Occupied Territories and Lebanon) in proposing the following resolution on the House floor:

109th CONGRESS
2d Session

H. CON. RES. 450

Calling upon the President to appeal to all sides in the current crisis in the Middle East for an immediate cessation of violence and to commit United States diplomats to multi-party negotiations with no preconditions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 19, 2006

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. LEE, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. FILNER, Mr. STARK, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. WATERS, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. RUSH, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Ms. SOLIS, and Mr. MEEKS of New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations


CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling upon the President to appeal to all sides in the current crisis in the Middle East for an immediate cessation of violence and to commit United States diplomats to multi-party negotiations with no preconditions.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress--
      (1) calls upon the President to--
        (A) appeal to all sides in the current crisis in the Middle East for an immediate cessation of violence;
        (B) commit United States diplomats to multi-party negotiations with no preconditions; and
        (C) send a high-level diplomatic mission to the region to facilitate such multi-party negotiations;
      (2) urges such multi-party negotiations to begin as soon as possible, including delegations from the governments of Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Lebanon, Iran, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt; and
      (3) supports an international peacekeeping mission to southern Lebanon to prevent cross-border skirmishes during such multi-party negotiations.

This is exactly what we need. The crushing of the Palestinians and the refusal to work at all with their elected government -- as well as de facto support for Israel's continued attacks and excursions in the West Bank and Gaza -- is what started this conflict in the first place, leading to the Palestinians fighting back by kidnapping Corporal Shalit and the series of reprisals and intervention of Hezbollah. This resolution calls for an immediate end to the fighting (which Bush could bring about instantly with any kind of diplomatic message to Israel) and bringing all the parties to talks (which could've prevented the brutal economic strangulation of the Palestinians following the election of the Hamas Government in the first place).


You go, Kucinich. You've always been a brave voice, more a Green than a Democrat (for better or worse).


Hope for peace,

Zaid



Friday, July 14, 2006

The House Back In Action

All this commotion in the Middle East being referred to as "World War III" has gotten me back up here posting, because as usual the business media has decided, "oh we'll just take the rest of the century off from investigative reporting and just parrot whatever the politicians have to say."

Crisis in Gaza/Israel/Lebanon

Officially, this crisis started with a Palestinian group attacking an Israeli Defense Forces unit and kidnapping two of its soldiers. In response, Israel bombed a Palestinian power plant (cutting off water and electricity to hundreds of thousands of civilians -- a major war crime) and then burning down the Palestinian legislature.

Actually, the crisis started much before. Since Hamas was elected, it was honoring a ceasefire with the Israeli government. Israel never honored any such thing. It continued to expand in the West Bank and bombard the Gaza Strip -- killing dozens of Palestinians with no reprisal from Hamas. And Hamas was trumpeted as the deadly terrorist group that must be starved to death (the cutoff of aid, which reduced thousands of Palestinians into poverty).

Finally, Israel shelled a beach in Gaza, wounding and killing dozens of Palestinians just going about their lives. Hamas called the ceasefire off (after allowing scores of its citizens to be murdered while taining the ceasefire).

Then on June 24 a Gaza doctor and his brother were kidnapped. That was the final straw, and the military operation against IDF soldiers (whereas Israel had mostly been killing and kidnapping civilians) took place, and the IDF responded brutally.

Then Lebanon's resistance group Hezbollah (which repelled the IDF in Lebanon many years ago) got into the whole mess by attacking another IDF group. Israel responded by bombing over 40 targets in Lebanon and killing or wounding hundreds of people.

And I keep hearing one tired message from US media and politicians (both bought off by Israel's lobby -- AIPAC): "Israel has the right to defend herself"

You know what? They're absolutely right. Any sovereign people have the right to self-defense. But here's the thing: So do the Palestinians and Lebanese.

Thousands of Palestinian and Lebanese citizens have "disappeared" into Israeli jails and prisons -- illegally kidnapped. But if Hezbollah or Hamas was bombing Israeli airports and villages and roads and bridges in response -- they'd rightly be claimed to be committing terror. But when Israelis are kidnapped, they are given the A-OK to widespread bombing of Gaza and Beirut.

Why? You have to ask yourself why the West has such a perverted version of justice.

Well, it's because they're not aiming for it.

Israel wants to control Gaza again. Israel wants to control southern Lebanon again. Both areas are resource-rich, and brought great economic and labor benefits to Israel. The US, which subdizes and approves of everything the IDF does, wants to see Hezbollah crushed, because it was the most successful resistance movement in the history of the Muslim World, having pushed Israel out of its invasion of Lebanon once before.

There is no "double standard" of justice here; there is a single standard: that the rich and powerful will crush the weak and ordinary into the ground, without any moral concern, and all of us just have to sit back and accept it. It's the "single standard" abhored by Adam Smith, who called it the "vile maxim of the Masters."

And the result? See for yourself:














You can see MIT professor and world affairs expert Noam Chomsky talk about this and author Ron Suskind talk about how his sources within the military  confirmed that Al Jazeera was deliberately bombed by President Bush (a major war crime) at these links here of today's edition of Democracy Now! radio and TV show:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/14/146258

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/14/147205



Mike Luckovich

Even in the darkest times Luckovich can cheer us up  -- a little

President Bush -- gallantly NOT saving the day!

Oh and one last thing

I was a finalist in The Nation's student essay contest. You can read my essay published in their website here:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060717/jilani

Hope you enjoy it

And hope for peace,

- Zaid


Sunday, June 11, 2006

The House suffers an "American Blackout"




Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney with GNN director Ian Inaba



All I can say is:

wow.

Last night I went with my sister and dad to the Atlanta Film Festival, where we saw the Atlanta premier of the Sundance favorite "American Blackout."

Ms. McKinney was dressed in African garb with a peace sign where congressmen usually put their American flag pin (oh, you mean this is AMERICA? I thought this was the Dominican Republic -- thanks for reminding me Captain ******* Obvious Congressman!). My family all shook her hand and we went and sat in the Georgia State University auditorium to watch the film.

The head director of the Atlanta Film Festival came up and spoke about how he and Congresswoman McKinney were at the premeir at Sundance. The film won there big, and it was worth going to a place where the temperature was "about 3 or 4 hundred degrees below zero," he joked.

We first watched a cool short named "Spin." It was a great art film, the kind of stuff you don't get to see in the corporate theaters.

Next we saw "American Blackout."

This film blew me away.

It was created by Ian Inaba, a graduate of UCLA film school (who also attended the screening). He stayed with Ms. McKinney for three years, documenting her activities in Congress and the way the rest of the politicians and the media treated her and portrayed her. He also met with many other journalists (as close as the Atlanta Journal Constitution and as far away as the BBC's Greg Palast) and a few more politicians (Congressmen Bernie Sanders, John Lewis, John Conyers) to discuss democracy in America in relation to Black people.

The film starts with an investigation into the year 2000 election.

This was jaw-dropping. Cynthia McKinney and John Lewis, the Atlanta-area Congressmen set up a special investigation into the 2000 election, interviewing the head of the Atlanta-based private corporation that help set up the voter rolls in Florida. The man openly admit that his country had disenfranchised THOUSANDS of people from voting in Florida -- with rolls they had helped get from Republicans in Texas and Florida.

But get this: the only living taped recording of this investigation was captured by a man sitting close to me, the guy who runs Atlanta Indymedia, an independent progressive news network. The ONLY LIVING RECORDING of the investigation that looked into how a virtual coup de tat occured in our country and set across events across the world was captured by the man sitting close to me -- and most of the American public has never seen it.

Ian Inaba, the director, told us that there were other local news stations at the investigation, but none of them ever aired the footage.

Hmm. Imagine that.

Congressman Lewis told us the devastating truth about all of this: if it weren't for this coup de tat and the corporate media's virtual silence over the direct wiping out of thousands of voters simply because they were black or latino, "Al Gore would be President right now, and there would be no war in Iraq."

The film then went into McKinney's life. It showed her activities in Congress, her home life, her friends.

Then it got nasty.

Ms. McKinney was the first and only Congressperson after 9/11 to question the Bush Administration's sequence of events. She asked, "What did you know and when did you know it about 9/11?"

Then all hell broke loose. The media attacked her, saying she was saying Bush pulled off the attacks. Members of her own party tried to shut her up. Both the President and Vice President called the Democratic leaders and forced them not to do an investigation into 9/11. But she wouldn't keep her mouth shut, so she continued to be attacked.

Now we come to the Heart of Darkness. Republicans staged a campaign against her in 2002. They knew a Republican hadn't a chance in hell of ever winning the 4th district. So they mobilized all of their Republican voters to seize the Democratic Primary. They hired a man (interviewed in the film) to run what was close to a racist campaign against her -- selecting mostly white males to come into the Primary and vote for Denise Majette, her opponent. In a district with only 7,000 registered Republicans, maybe 1/3 of the total votes for the Democratic Primary came from REPUBLICANS.

And they sent a great deal of money to Majette. Majette accused McKinney of getting money from Arab terrorist organizations. The AJC (atlanta journal constitution newspaper) kindly helped foment that rumor as well as saying she was thinking 9/11 happened because Bush ordered it to happen (not the truth).

The film shows exactly who she got her money from: the head of a Muslim charity that had 0 terror links and a Muslim NBA player.

Congresswoman McKinney lost 2002. It was later admitted by the Bush Administration after prodding by the 9/11 Commission and Michael Moore and Greg Palast and others that, yes, they did know there were warnings of the 9/11 attack. Many of them. They ignored them. McKinney was right. But the media didn't backtrack to set the story straight. No, McKinney was a conspiracy, far-left black fanatic. That was much better selling story.

But McKinney and her people mobilized in the two years between 2002 and 2004. She gave more than forty speeches across the country. She strongly campaigned against the war. Majette decided she didn't even want to go for reelection. She took a suicidal bid at Senate and lost. McKinney won the primary with about 50% of the votes, her two closest opponents getting about 20 percent each. This time McKinney had a team of lawyers with her, determined to stop disenfranchisement of black voters.

So McKinney regained her seat -- but Nancy Pelosi refused to give her her seniority back. A Republican who returned after a 15 year hiatus got his seniority back. Pelosi didn't want a strong progressive to stand up in the Congress. After all, Pelosi didn't hammer Bush about the 9/11 investigations like McKinney did. She didn't want investigations into child slavery and sex slaves in US contractors. She didn't care enough to ask for a negotiation into black voter disenfranchisement, with maybe over a million eligible voters blocked off the polls. No, McKinney was a "firebrand" -- so Pelosi stripped her of her seniority.

The film then continues, talking to many other politicians and journalists about McKinney and the horrible plague of black voters getting stripped from the voting list by Republican-controlled electronic machines and vote counters.

Greg Palast says "McKinney has a constant case of Touerrett's Syndrome -- She can't stop telling the truth." Congressman Lewis, a civil rights hero who was good friends with Reverend Jackson and King, recounted on how badly he was beaten fighting for the right to vote all those years ago -- and how the deaths of so many activists are being shamed by the illegal disenfranchisement of black and latino voters. Congressman Bernie Sanders, the socialist Independent from Vermont, talked about how money controls politics, and how anyone who goes past a certain line in attacking the status quo as McKinney did -- well, you know what happens to them. The AJC later apologizes for slandering McKinney.

And then comes election 2004. In Ohio districts with white republicans at the helm get far more voting machines per person -- the man who organized this is interviewed and found to be a liar. Kenneth Blackwell, the secretary of state in Ohio, nixes any kind of investigation into it. Black voters standing four hours in the rain, many going home, are shown.

Election 2004 -- was possibly stolen.

I'd never believed this before watching this film. Now I do believe. Some may say the points the film makes (it and its many awards it has recieved) are debateable. To that I say -- EXACTLY! It SHOULD be debated. The progressive, black, minority, Left in this country can't all be dismissed by a white, powerful Establishment. We need FREE DISCUSSION is what this movie is trying to say. We need to be able to rebel without being attacked by all corners, without being suppressed into nothing by a thousand roadblocks to democracy!

After the film ended I went and thanked Ian Inaba. I told him I lived in an upper middle class, "non-progressive" district, and films like this "blew my mind." The Congresswoman, Inaba, and the audience discussed a lot about the film. It was apparent we were outraged. Outraged that a defiant rebel is attacked with lies and slander simply because she is a defiant rebel. Outraged that our country's elections can be blatantly STOLEN and anyone who fights that is labeled a conspiracy nut. Outraged that anyone who joined the antiwar movement is a "firebrand." Outraged that, in the words of the BBC's Greg Palast, we are still living with "apartheid elections, apartheid media, and an Apartheid America"

I don't care at all about this cop incident with McKinney. Maybe she was wrong. Big deal. She's been an outspoken voice for the poor and downtrodden, taking every risk for her constituents (she talks about in the film how she was stalked by a Saudi man and the Ku Klux Klan for her positions).

This is what happens to a rebel. Any little thing is used to attack them. They have to be saintly -- otherwise they are demons in the eyes of a powerful establishment. Meanwhile blatant war criminals, thugs who bend to the will of any corporate donor or lobbyist -- they are angels, the embodiment of kind Anglo Saxon values.

I stand with Cynthia McKinney. I wish she was my congressman, not that party-liner Tom Price. And I'm proud of her and the progresssive left and the minority voters who stood for hours more than their white counterparts in the rain, because their districts are less wealthy and apparently are less worthy of getting a free and fair vote as Ohio 2004 has shown.

I am outraged, and if you aren't, see American Blackout.

Thanks for reading.



Next 5 >>